Incident Timeline Reconstruction
Organize logs, alerts and observed changes into a sequence that helps explain how an incident unfolded.
Security ResearchSecurity built around real infrastructure
Turn suspicious activity into clear technical findings.
When an incident does not fit a simple checklist, Codory can investigate logs, infrastructure behavior, suspicious files, indicators and timelines to help explain what likely happened and what should change next.
Threat AnalysisIncident TimelineEvidence ReviewActionable Findings
Investigation boardCase SR-26
SignalUnusual login pattern02:14 UTC
ArtifactSuspicious file change02:18 UTC
NetworkRepeated request source02:21 UTC
FindingExposed path identifiedConfidence: high
Finding draftedEvidence → impact → next action
InvestigateConnect logs, symptoms and technical signals
IndicatorsReview suspicious artifacts and known patterns
Attack pathMap likely exposure and affected components
FindingsDocument evidence, confidence and next actions
What we cover
Practical security work for the exposed parts of your business.
Each engagement is scoped around the systems, access and risk that actually exist—not a generic checklist copied onto every environment.
Indicator Review
Examine suspicious domains, IPs, files, hashes, processes or request patterns supplied as part of an authorized investigation.
Malware & File Triage
Review suspicious website or server artifacts to determine whether they warrant deeper containment or cleanup.
Exposure & Attack-Path Analysis
Connect technical weaknesses, exposed services and application behavior to likely paths an attacker could have used.
Log Correlation
Compare web, application, authentication and system events to find meaningful relationships rather than isolated alerts.
Research Notes & Findings
Produce concise findings with evidence, uncertainty, impact and recommended next steps for the technical team.
Evidence-led investigation
Separate what is known from what is only suspected.
Security research is most useful when evidence is fragmented. We connect timestamps, logs, artifacts and infrastructure behavior, then state the confidence behind each conclusion.
Confirmed evidenceLikely explanationOpen question
02:14Authentication anomalyRepeated login attempts appear in logs
02:18File timestamp changesUnexpected modification detected
02:21Request pattern correlatesWeb activity aligns with system event
03:05Containment actionAffected path isolated for review
How we work
Clear scope, evidence and next actions.
Security work is easier to act on when responsibilities, findings and follow-up are explicit from the start.
Scope
Define the systems, access, business context and boundaries for the work.
Review
Collect the relevant configuration, logs, traffic or application evidence.
Analyze
Separate meaningful risk from noise and identify the most important weaknesses.
Act
Apply or recommend changes in a controlled order based on impact.
Verify
Recheck the result and document what changed, what remains and what to monitor.
Frequently asked questions
Questions about Security Research & Threat Analysis.
Direct answers about scope, access, limitations and what you can expect from the service.
When would I need Security Research instead of a normal scan?
Research is useful when you already have suspicious activity, an unusual incident, conflicting evidence or a technical question that cannot be answered by a standard vulnerability scan.
Can you investigate a hacked website?
Yes, if you can provide access and relevant logs or files. The work can help identify affected areas, suspicious artifacts and likely contributing weaknesses.
Can you analyze server logs?
Yes. Web, authentication, application and system logs can be correlated when they are available and within the investigation scope.
Do you identify the real person behind an attack?
Attribution is often uncertain and may require legal or provider-level evidence that is not available from server logs alone. We separate technical indicators from speculation.
Can you review suspicious files or malware samples?
Yes, for defensive analysis within an authorized investigation. The goal is to understand risk, indicators and containment needs.
Will I receive a written finding?
Yes. The output can include observed evidence, timeline, likely explanation, confidence level, affected components and recommended actions.
Can you help after the research is complete?
Yes. Findings can feed into cleanup, hardening, server management, monitoring or application fixes.
Do you work with third-party hosting logs or provider reports?
Yes, when those materials are available to you and relevant to the authorized investigation.
Need security help?
Tell us what you are seeing and what needs protection.
Share the website, server or incident context and our team can help define the next useful step.