TLS & HTTPS Review
Inspect certificate deployment, HTTPS behavior and common transport-security configuration issues.
Vulnerability CheckerSecurity built around real infrastructure
Find exposed weaknesses before they become incidents.
Codory reviews the public-facing security posture of websites and web applications, then turns the findings into a prioritized list your team can actually fix.
Security ScanRisk PriorityFix GuidanceRecheck
security-scan
$ checking public surface...
HTTPS configuration
review security headers
exposed component needs update
admin path protected
Security posture78Prioritize 3 findings
High1
Medium2
Low4
External surfaceReview what is visible from the internet
TLS & headersCheck transport and browser security controls
Application signalsReview common web security weaknesses
Clear reportPrioritized findings with remediation notes
What we cover
Practical security work for the exposed parts of your business.
Each engagement is scoped around the systems, access and risk that actually exist—not a generic checklist copied onto every environment.
Security Headers
Review browser-facing headers such as content, framing, referrer and transport policies where applicable.
CMS & Component Exposure
Identify outdated or unnecessarily exposed CMS, plugin, theme or application component signals.
Public Exposure Review
Check administrative paths, directories, services and other externally visible areas that deserve tighter control.
Common Web Weaknesses
Review signs of common application security issues and unsafe configuration patterns without turning the report into exploit instructions.
Remediation Priority
Group findings by practical severity, business impact and recommended order of remediation.
From scan to fix
A finding only matters if your team knows what to do next.
The report is organized around practical remediation: what was observed, why it matters, how urgent it is, and what should be changed or verified.
ObservedWhat the assessment actually found
PrioritizedSeverity plus real business context
RemediatedConfiguration or code change guidance
RecheckedConfirm the issue is no longer exposed
Finding #03Security headers incomplete
Browser-side controls are incomplete for the exposed application response.
Recommended actionReview policy requirements, apply safely, then recheck affected pages.
How we work
Clear scope, evidence and next actions.
Security work is easier to act on when responsibilities, findings and follow-up are explicit from the start.
Scope
Define the systems, access, business context and boundaries for the work.
Review
Collect the relevant configuration, logs, traffic or application evidence.
Analyze
Separate meaningful risk from noise and identify the most important weaknesses.
Act
Apply or recommend changes in a controlled order based on impact.
Verify
Recheck the result and document what changed, what remains and what to monitor.
Frequently asked questions
Questions about Website Vulnerability Checker.
Direct answers about scope, access, limitations and what you can expect from the service.
What does the Vulnerability Checker review?
It reviews the website or web application surface that is in scope, including transport security, headers, public exposure, application signals and common configuration weaknesses.
Is this a penetration test?
No. A vulnerability check is a focused security assessment and scan. A full penetration test is deeper, more manual and requires a separately defined authorization and scope.
Will the scan damage my website?
The assessment is intended to be non-destructive. We avoid disruptive testing and define scope before any deeper validation is performed.
Can you scan a staging website instead of production?
Yes. Staging is often a good place to review changes before release, provided it reflects the relevant production configuration.
Do you fix the issues you find?
We can fix many server, configuration and website issues when access is available. Application-code fixes may require coordination with the development team.
Can you recheck after fixes are applied?
Yes. A recheck can confirm whether the reported exposure has been removed or reduced.
Can you review WordPress or other CMS websites?
Yes. CMS-based sites can be reviewed for exposed components, configuration weaknesses and general security posture.
Do you provide a severity report?
Yes. Findings can be grouped by severity and practical priority so the most important remediation work is clear first.
Need security help?
Tell us what you are seeing and what needs protection.
Share the website, server or incident context and our team can help define the next useful step.